Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Any chance of getting some pull requests with the changes (ideally one per feature/change) so that they can be included in the builds here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
You should pull from my repository until I get feedback/clearance from the project leads. I just posted in the last couple of hours. I was just waiting to get approval to work off of and/ or merge with the master project.Gregory MeiselifelseWare, Inc. 6037 Cedar Pine DrOrlando, FL ***@***.*** Feb 8, 2026, at 5:56 PM, Julian Waller ***@***.***> wrote:
Any chance of getting some pull requests with the changes (ideally one per feature/change) so that they can be included in the builds here?
I can't tell (without quite a bit of effort) what you have changed currently, because you have uploaded the whole repository as a single commit
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi CasparCG team,
I've been working on solving the persistent audio sync issues in CasparCG 2.5 and have developed a production-tested solution that might be of interest.
Repository: https://github.com/gmeisel01/casparcg-2.5-enhancements
What it solves:
Key features:
Production tested with:
I'd love to get your feedback on this approach and discuss whether these enhancements would be suitable for merging into the main project. Happy to make adjustments based on your architectural preferences.
The implementation is fully documented in the README with real-world performance data.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions