Sort ExportedType table when writing to comply with new ECMA Augments#559
Merged
wtfsck merged 1 commit into0xd4d:masterfrom May 30, 2024
Merged
Conversation
wtfsck
approved these changes
May 30, 2024
Contributor
|
Thanks, added an issue about disposing of enumerators: #560 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #558
The algorithm suggested in the issue was adjusted to allow more than one nested type per exported type.
Something to consider:
The current algorithm does not dispose of the enumerators generated just like the method in
dnlib/src/DotNet/AllTypesHelper.cs
Line 14 in 4e0837c
Diposemethod but this is something we'd probably need to add to both implementations for future-proofing and potential reuse. Perhaps we could also extract this traversal into an additional class for future use.