FRIntel Celeron J4125 vs Rockchip RK3588S
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Celeron J4125 on one side and the Rockchip RK3588S on the other side, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first is dedicated to the mini desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.7GHz. The second is used on the single-board computer segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench and Cinebench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Celeron J4125 | Rockchip RK3588S | ||||||
| Market (main) | Mini desktop | Single-board computer | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Goldmont Plus | Cortex-A76, Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Core name | Gemini Lake Refresh | Cortex-A76, Cortex-A55 | ||||||
| Family | Celeron 4000 | RK35 Series | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | FH8068003067410, SRGZS | RK3588S | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2019 | Q2 2022 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm LP | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2.0 GHz | 400 MHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | - |
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 0.4 / 1.8 GHz, + 3x ARM Cortex-M0 (MCU) | ||||||
| High performance cores | - |
4x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 0.4 / 2.2 / 2.4 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 4 MB |
768 KB L1 Cache, 2.5 MB L2 Cache, 3 MB L3 Cache, 1 MB SLC Cache | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4/LPDDR4 |
LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 6 | 1 | ||||||
| TDP | 10 W |
12 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | ARM Mali-G610 MP4 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 12 | 4 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 96 | 256 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 250 MHz | 1000 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 750 MHz | 1000 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 144 GFLOPS | 450 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Additional graphics features | - |
OpenCL 1.1, 1.2, 2.0, 2.2, OpenGL ES 1.1, 2.0, 3.1, 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, 1.2, Advanced Graphics Rendering, Multi-Screen Display, 2D Image Acceleration Module, ARM Frame Buffer Compression, Image Enhancement Processor, Video HDR Output, 4x256Kb L2 Cache | ||||||
| Socket(s) | BGA1090 | FCCSP1253L | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket BGA 1090 Motherboard  |
- | ||||||
| Drystone MIPS | - | 131,342 DMIPS | ||||||
| AI accelerator | - |
Neural Processing Unit, Triple-Core Architecture, INT4, INT8, INT16, FP16, BF16, & TF32 Data Types, Machine Learning, Computer Vision, Intelligent Applications, TensorFlow, MXNet, PyTorch, Caffe | ||||||
| AI computing operations per seconds | - | 6 TOPS | ||||||
| Crypto engine | - |
Cryptography Extensions, SHA-1, SHA-256/224, SHA-512/384, MD5, SM3, HMAC, AES-128, AES-192, AES-256, AES, ECB, CBC, OFB, CFB, CTR, CTS, XTS, CCM, GCM, CBC-MAC, CMAC, SM4, DES, TDES, ECC, SM2, Secure OTP | ||||||
| Security | - |
Trustzone | ||||||
| ISP | - | Dual Pipe ISP | ||||||
| Max display resolution | - |
7680 x 4320@60Hz (HDMI TX), 8192 x 4320@30Hz (DP TX), 4K@60Hz (eDP), 2160p@60Hz (HDMI 2.0), 4K@60Hz (MIPI DSI), 3840 x 2160p@30Hz (HDMI 1.4b), 1920 x 1080@60Hz (BT.1120) | ||||||
| Video decoding | - |
H.265 HEVC/MVC, VP9, AVS2 8K@60fps, H.264 AVC/MVC 8K@30fps, AV1 4K@60fps, MPEG-2, MPEG-1, VC-1, VP8 1080p@60fps, MJPEG, JPEG 65536 x 65536, HDR10, HDR HLG | ||||||
| Video encoding | - |
H.265, H.264 8K@30fps, JPEG 8192 x 8192 | ||||||
| Max camera ISP | - |
48 MP; 32 MP; 16 MP | ||||||
| Max video capture | - |
48 MP@15fps; 32 MP@30fps; 16 MP@30fps | ||||||
| Additional camera features | - |
HDR & 3DNR Technology, 3A Functions, Automatic Focus, Automatic Exposure, Automatic White-Balance, Fixed Pattern Noise Removal, Black Level Correction, Static/Dynamic Defect Pixel Cluster Correction, Phase Detection Auto Focus, Lens Shading Correction, Spatial Bayer-RAW De-Noising, Temporal Bayer-RAW De-Noising, 3-Frame Merge into HDR, HDR Dynamic Range Comprerssion, Tone Mapping, Chromatic Aberration Correction, Color Correction Matrix, Gamma Out Correction, 3D-Lut Color Palette, Lens Distortion Horizontal Direction, Spatial YUV De-Noising, Sharpening, Dehaze, Fisheye Correction, Gamma Correction, 2x MIPI-CSI DPHY 4L/CPHY 3L, 2x MIPI-CSI DPHY 2L, DVP Interface | ||||||
| Modem | - |
10/100/1000M Ethernet GMAC | ||||||
| Connectivity | - |
eDP 1.3 4 Lane (HDCP 1.3), DP TX 1.4 4 Lane (HDCP 1.3, HDCP 2.3), PCIe 2.1, USB 3.1 Gen1 OTG/Host, USB 2.0 OTG, USB TYPE-C, 2x USB 2.0 Host, HDMI 2.1 TX, HDMI 2.0 RX, HDMI TX (DSC 1.2a, HDCP 2.3), PCIe 3.0, PCIe 2.0, 2x MIPI-DSI DPHY 4 Lane (RGB, DSC 1.1/1.2a), BT.1120 (RGB), eMMC 5.1, SD 3.0, MMC 4.5, 6x SPI, 9x I2C, 10x UART, SDIO 3.0, GPIO, SATA 3.0, 3x CAN, RGMII | ||||||
| Wi-Fi | - |
Wi-Fi 6 2.4GHz/5GHz | ||||||
| Bluetooth | - |
Bluetooth 5.0 | ||||||
| Audio | - |
4x I2S/PCM/TDM, 2x SPDIF (8-ch), PDM (8-ch), Audio PWM, VAD, Digital Audio Codec (2x DAC) | ||||||
| Additional features | - |
OS Support: Android, Linux, Market: AIoT devices, Smart Displays, Industrial Automation, Embedded Systems, 8K Multimedia Systems, Edge Computing & Servers, Gaming & AR/VR, System Peripheral: CRU (18x PLLs), PMU, System Register, 30x Timer, 16x PWMs, 5x Watchdog, 2x Crypto, SAR-ADC, TS-ADC, Interrupt Controller (12 PPI, 480 SPI), 3x DMAC (8-ch), Secure System, 6x PVTM, 3x Mailbox, DynamIQ Shared Unit, NEON Coprocessor, FCCSP1253L, 17mm x 17mm, 0.26mm Size, 0.4mm Pitch | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1,162 | 1,451 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3,031 | 4,502 | ||||||
| (Windows | Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,941 | 2,160 | ||||||
| (Windows | Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,820 | 8,010 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core | 442 | 574 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,434 | 2,409 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS Performance | 45.4 GFLOPS | 75.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 582 pts / W | 668 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have an ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Rockchip RK3588S has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Celeron J4125 is greater, that the PDT of Intel Celeron J4125 is lower. The Rockchip RK3588S was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android & Linux | |
|---|---|
| Rockchip RK3588S |
2,160 8,010 |
| Intel Celeron J4125 |
2,104 5,387 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 49%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Windows:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| Rockchip RK3588S |
574 2,409 |
| Intel Celeron J4125 |
442 1,434 |
In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 68%.
With Linux:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Linux | |
|---|---|
| Rockchip RK3588S |
543 2,379 |
| Intel Celeron J4125 |
458 1,464 |
In single core, the difference is 19%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 63%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Celeron J4125 AMD EquivalentRockchip RK3588S Intel EquivalentRockchip RK3588S AMD EquivalentSee also:
Rockchip RK3588Rockchip RK3588S2Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.