James Caplon Answell arranges to visit his future father-in-law, Avory Hume, at his house in London. Hume invites the prospective bridegroom into his strong room that is fitted with sturdy metal shutters and a thick wooden door. The room contains trophies and arrows that relate to Hume's hobby of archery, and they chat about archery while Hume pours drinks from a cut-glass decanter. As Answell collapses, he realizes that the drink has been drugged. When he comes to, he's alone in the locked and bolted room with Hume, who has been fatally skewered with an arrow.
The remainder of the novel takes place at Answell's trial for the murder of Hume, and he is being defended by barrister and amateur detective Sir Henry Merrivale. We learn that Hume has set the actions of the plot in motion because he believes that he is having an interview not with the wealthy and blameless man who wants to marry his daughter, but a similarly named relative, Captain Answell, who is blackmailing her (and in a plot development that is extremely frank for the mores of 1938, she is being blackmailed because she posed for "obscene" photographs for her lover). Hume's household has participated to some extent in the activities that have conspired to make Answell look guilty. The decanter with the drugged drink has been replaced with an innocuous duplicate, and some mysteriously disappearing items include a suitcase full of clothing and an ink-pad. But it is the location of a tiny piece of blue feather from the fatal arrow that proves to be the decisive clue that reveals the murderer—it's revealed in the climactic courtroom scene to be hidden in the "Judas window".
In the British prison system, a "Judas window" is in the door of a cell and enables the guards to observe prisoners without being seen themselves. But Sir Henry Merrivale points out another Judas window that is in every room, but that no one notices.
more...
The remainder of the novel takes place at Answell's trial for the murder of Hume, and he is being defended by barrister and amateur detective Sir Henry Merrivale. We learn that Hume has set the actions of the plot in motion because he believes that he is having an interview not with the wealthy and blameless man who wants to marry his daughter, but a similarly named relative, Captain Answell, who is blackmailing her (and in a plot development that is extremely frank for the mores of 1938, she is being blackmailed because she posed for "obscene" photographs for her lover). Hume's household has participated to some extent in the activities that have conspired to make Answell look guilty. The decanter with the drugged drink has been replaced with an innocuous duplicate, and some mysteriously disappearing items include a suitcase full of clothing and an ink-pad. But it is the location of a tiny piece of blue feather from the fatal arrow that proves to be the decisive clue that reveals the murderer—it's revealed in the climactic courtroom scene to be hidden in the "Judas window".
In the British prison system, a "Judas window" is in the door of a cell and enables the guards to observe prisoners without being seen themselves. But Sir Henry Merrivale points out another Judas window that is in every room, but that no one notices.

补标,读过的第一本法庭推理,辩论过程很精彩华丽,密室诡计本身倒是不复杂甚至有点太简单,稍微有点撑不起篇幅。
最大的问题在于密室诡计过时了,是很古典的机械手法(这种诡计放氩气的密室时代里,恐怕在神秘做题女手上活不过三十页)。围绕核诡「犹大之窗」构筑的情节与悬念也显得乏善可陈。// 本作的另一个特点是选择了法庭推理的舞台,高强度的辩论与询问一直在引入悬念并予以反转。但故事一直没有更换场景,登场人物众多(除开一整本书不断登场的证人们,到后期在法官、书记员、H&M、“我”等人之间切换视角来复盘案件和庭审过程),所以阅读体验不是很好。除此之外,凶手的身份、案件的意外性、锁凶逻辑都很一般(虽然很公平但也很简单)。唯一值得称道的优点是全书的逻辑很不错,最近看了不少新本格之后重新品味黄金时代的作品,扎实的逻辑性实在是令人舒心。// 即便如此,我依然不推荐这本书,除非你是刚接触推理且打算从黄金三大家最基础的作品读起。
听说是密室的标杆作品就看了一下,是因为年代太久远吗,以现在的眼光看的话感觉就人称诡计部分有趣一点,密室手法感觉纯纯闹麻。
法庭推理,这个底有点烂
各方面都很典型的古典推理
考虑到时代,密室设计放今天看还是简单了点,法庭辩论倒挺有意思的
诡计放在现在真的不够看(密室很潦草 除了第一个谜团的解开方式以外都平平无奇
无聊
不错的法庭推理,手法有些简单
关于密室中两人对话的疑点在卡尔作品里也算不上多离奇,针对这部分疑点的解答也无出彩之处。谜面与解答之间没有势能差。密室也是我最无感的机械手法。法庭部分比起推理更偏向辩论。最后的锁凶也只是没有新意的时间表。