Message 99591 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	l0nwlf
Recipients	flox, georg.brandl, jackdied, l0nwlf
Date	2010-02-19.20:08:23
SpamBayes Score	5.2625313e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
While I was checking 2.7, /Demo/scripts, some of the codes followed the most naive approach (unoptimized) like /Demo/scripts/fact.py which calculate factors and /Demo/scripts/prime.py which calculates prime. Shall I write the optimized version(if no-one have issues), or the rudimentary working versions are good as of now ?

While I was checking 2.7, /Demo/scripts, some of the codes followed the most naive approach (unoptimized) like /Demo/scripts/fact.py which calculate factors and /Demo/scripts/prime.py which calculates prime. Shall I write the optimized version(if no-one have issues), or the rudimentary working versions are good as of now ?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-02-19 20:08:25	l0nwlf	set	recipients: + l0nwlf, georg.brandl, jackdied, flox
2010-02-19 20:08:25	l0nwlf	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-02-19 20:08:23	l0nwlf	link	issue7962 messages
2010-02-19 20:08:23	l0nwlf	create