Message 99416 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	techtonik
Recipients	georg.brandl, r.david.murray, techtonik
Date	2010-02-16.15:22:22
SpamBayes Score	2.860983e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I can't see changes to subprocess.call() docs in issue #6760. I reopen this bug, because call() definitely need a visible note about this significant behavior. I can not reopen #6760 http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#convenience-functions

I can't see changes to subprocess.call() docs in issue #6760. I reopen this bug, because call() definitely need a visible note about this significant behavior. I can not reopen #6760

http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#convenience-functions

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-02-16 15:22:24	techtonik	set	recipients: + techtonik, georg.brandl, r.david.murray
2010-02-16 15:22:24	techtonik	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-02-16 15:22:22	techtonik	link	issue7939 messages
2010-02-16 15:22:22	techtonik	create