Message 69959 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nedds
Recipients	collinwinter, ctheune, nedds
Date	2008-07-18.17:25:09
SpamBayes Score	0.09586381
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I believe the problem was that in the case of this fix, rather than using set_prefix to give the new node the same prefix as before, new.prefix = was used. Here is the one line fix which preserves the prefix in the example given.

I believe the problem was that in the case of this fix, rather than
using set_prefix to give the new node the same prefix as before,
new.prefix = was used. Here is the one line fix which preserves the
prefix in the example given.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-18 17:25:13	nedds	set	spambayes_score: 0.0958638 -> 0.09586381 recipients: + nedds, collinwinter, ctheune
2008-07-18 17:25:12	nedds	set	spambayes_score: 0.0958638 -> 0.0958638 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-07-18 17:25:11	nedds	link	issue3334 messages
2008-07-18 17:25:10	nedds	create