Message 382177 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	BTaskaya
Recipients	BTaskaya, Mark.Shannon, christian.heimes, josh.r, mark.dickinson, pablogsal, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date	2020-11-30.19:16:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> I have to say that I feel that this will complicate things too much. Part of the appeal of this change is how straightforward and maintainable is. Fiddling with code objects lowers the watermark. Agreed. And I'd go for either making slices hashable as is, or rejecting this patch without implementing more hacks to the Python / messing with the compiler.

> I have to say that I feel that this will complicate things too much. Part of the appeal of this change is how straightforward and maintainable is. Fiddling with code objects lowers the watermark.

Agreed. And I'd go for either making slices hashable as is, or rejecting this patch without implementing more hacks to the Python / messing with the compiler.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-11-30 19:16:27	BTaskaya	set	recipients: + BTaskaya, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, christian.heimes, Mark.Shannon, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r, pablogsal
2020-11-30 19:16:27	BTaskaya	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2020-11-30 19:16:27	BTaskaya	link	issue42454 messages
2020-11-30 19:16:27	BTaskaya	create