Message 353883 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, jdemeyer, larry, lukasz.langa, methane, miss-islington, nascheme, ned.deily, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, pitrou, tim.peters, vstinner
Date	2019-10-03.22:35:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> Would it make any sense to add an opt-in option to emit a warning when a new type is created with Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC but it doesn't implement tp_traverse? Or even fatal error out? There's no reason to have Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC but not implement tp_traverse, AFAIR.

> Would it make any sense to add an opt-in option to emit a warning when a new type is created with Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC but it doesn't implement tp_traverse?

Or even fatal error out?  There's no reason to have Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC but not implement tp_traverse, AFAIR.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-10-03 22:35:15	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, nascheme, vstinner, larry, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, petr.viktorin, methane, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, jdemeyer, pablogsal, miss-islington
2019-10-03 22:35:15	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2019-10-03 22:35:15	pitrou	link	issue38006 messages
2019-10-03 22:35:15	pitrou	create