Message 351007 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pablogsal
Recipients	Mark.Shannon, christian.heimes, jdemeyer, lukasz.langa, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2019-09-02.15:06:40
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
The more I think about this the more I think there is something else at play. If the GC is able to follow the dependency chain, all weakrefs should have been already managed correctly and PyObject_ClearWeakRefs should have never be invoked. I think something is not informing the gc about the dependency chain

The more I think about this the more I think there is something else at play. If the GC is able to follow the dependency chain, all weakrefs should have been already managed correctly and PyObject_ClearWeakRefs should have never be invoked.

I think *something* is not informing the gc about the dependency chain

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-09-02 15:06:40	pablogsal	set	recipients: + pablogsal, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, petr.viktorin, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, jdemeyer
2019-09-02 15:06:40	pablogsal	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2019-09-02 15:06:40	pablogsal	link	issue38006 messages
2019-09-02 15:06:40	pablogsal	create