Message 313286 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	josh.r
Recipients	josh.r
Date	2018-03-05.21:13:32
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Note: Obviously, defining __index__ without defining __int__ is a little strange (it's equivalent to int, but can't be coerced to int?), so yet another fix would be addressing #20092 so it wouldn't be possible for a type to define __index__ without (implicitly) defining __int__.

Note: Obviously, defining __index__ without defining __int__ is a little strange (it's *equivalent* to int, but can't be *coerced* to int?), so yet another fix would be addressing #20092 so it wouldn't be possible for a type to define __index__ without (implicitly) defining __int__.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-03-05 21:13:32	josh.r	set	recipients: + josh.r
2018-03-05 21:13:32	josh.r	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2018-03-05 21:13:32	josh.r	link	issue33002 messages
2018-03-05 21:13:32	josh.r	create