Message 308236 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nascheme
Recipients	arigo, martin.panter, nascheme, neologix, nikratio, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, vstinner, xgdomingo
Date	2017-12-13.19:30:25
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I created a new PR which uses the atexit module instead of using _Py_PyAtExit. I think registering in io.py is okay. I see that atexit is now implemented in C. Rather than registering in io.py, we could create a C API to register callbacks (i.e. atexit_register). That would perhaps be a bit cleaner.

I created a new PR which uses the atexit module instead of using _Py_PyAtExit.  I think registering in io.py is okay.

I see that atexit is now implemented in C.  Rather than registering in io.py, we could create a C API to register callbacks (i.e. atexit_register).  That would perhaps be a bit cleaner.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-12-13 19:30:25	nascheme	set	recipients: + nascheme, tim.peters, arigo, pitrou, vstinner, nikratio, neologix, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, xgdomingo
2017-12-13 19:30:25	nascheme	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2017-12-13 19:30:25	nascheme	link	issue17852 messages
2017-12-13 19:30:25	nascheme	create