Message303214
Antoine: "I think https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3796 is a better resolution. It creates an optional _uuid C extension to avoid ctypes if possible *and* also loads system functions lazily."
Implementing bpo-20519 is a very good idea. But I still like the idea of putting all these ugly functions to get the node and geneate a UUID1 object in a different module, since most of these code is not used on most platforms.
Antoine: Would you mind to modify your PR 3796 to only implement bpo-20519? I would prefer to reorganize uuid.py in a second step. It will be easy to review and easy to discuss what is the best option. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2017-09-28 10:50:49 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, orsenthil, kdart, pitrou, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, methane, nvetoshkin, knny-myer, nailor, Keith.Dart, hynek, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, Michael.Felt, [email protected] |
| 2017-09-28 10:50:48 | vstinner | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2017-09-28 10:50:48 | vstinner | link | issue11063 messages |
| 2017-09-28 10:50:48 | vstinner | create | |
|