Message 296881 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	mattbillenstein, ned.deily, neologix, njs, pitrou, ronaldoussoren, vstinner
Date	2017-06-26.11:55:08
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> It is actually the same issue as https://bugs.python.org/issue11768 (which was wrongly closed as fixed, apparently :-)) Well, don't be confused by the issue title. The only made change is to only call Py_AddPendingCall() only once, instead of calling it for each received signal. I don't know if the signal handler is really reentrant or not. Signal handling is hard :-(

> It is actually the same issue as https://bugs.python.org/issue11768 (which was wrongly closed as fixed, apparently :-))

Well, don't be confused by the issue title. The only made change is to only call Py_AddPendingCall() only once, instead of calling it for each received signal.

I don't know if the signal handler is really reentrant or not.

Signal handling is hard :-(

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-06-26 11:55:09	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, ronaldoussoren, pitrou, ned.deily, njs, neologix, mattbillenstein
2017-06-26 11:55:08	vstinner	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2017-06-26 11:55:08	vstinner	link	issue30703 messages
2017-06-26 11:55:08	vstinner	create