Message 258048 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	martin.panter
Recipients	asvetlov, brett.cannon, gvanrossum, martin.panter, ncoghlan, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2016-01-12.01:37:47
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
The patch looks like it adds checks for the special generator-like send() etc methods, but I was expecting __await__() to also (or instead) do this check. That way you wouldn’t have to break the iterator protocol by the iterator not raising StopIteration a second time. Also left some other review comments.

The patch looks like it adds checks for the special generator-like send() etc methods, but I was expecting __await__() to also (or instead) do this check. That way you wouldn’t have to break the iterator protocol by the iterator not raising StopIteration a second time.

Also left some other review comments.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-01-12 01:37:47	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, asvetlov, yselivanov
2016-01-12 01:37:47	martin.panter	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2016-01-12 01:37:47	martin.panter	link	issue25887 messages
2016-01-12 01:37:47	martin.panter	create