Message 168611 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Steve.Thompson, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, brian.curtin, desolat, eric.araujo, kevin.chen, markon, mucisland, ncoghlan, pdsimanyi, pitrou
Date	2012-08-20.01:27:33
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
OK, I tracked down the original reason for the behavioural change: #2051 The important aspect in that patch is preserving the read permissions from the .py file so we don't accidentally expose data to other users. Kevin's patch seems like a good approach for restoring compatibility in 2.7 and 3.2 In 3.3, it appears that #2051 has regressed, since no test was added to confirm the correct behaviour and importlib appears to behave more like 2.5.

OK, I tracked down the original reason for the behavioural change: #2051

The important aspect in that patch is preserving the *read* permissions from the .py file so we don't accidentally expose data to other users.

Kevin's patch seems like a good approach for restoring compatibility in 2.7 and 3.2

In 3.3, it appears that #2051 has regressed, since no test was added to confirm the correct behaviour and importlib appears to behave more like 2.5.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-08-20 01:27:54	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, barry, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, eric.araujo, brian.curtin, pdsimanyi, markon, mucisland, Steve.Thompson, desolat, kevin.chen
2012-08-20 01:27:54	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2012-08-20 01:27:33	ncoghlan	link	issue6074 messages
2012-08-20 01:27:33	ncoghlan	create