Message 113273 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	flox, ncoghlan, rhettinger
Date	2010-08-08.15:44:01
SpamBayes Score	0.0010452286
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
With Raymond adding functools.lru_cache and functools.lfu_cache, it should be possible to use those for the various caches in the standard library. My only point of concern is that the standard lib caches tend to allow dynamic modification of the max cache size, while the new cache decorators appear to be fixed at the size specified when defining the decorator.

With Raymond adding functools.lru_cache and functools.lfu_cache, it should be possible to use those for the various caches in the standard library.

My only point of concern is that the standard lib caches tend to allow dynamic modification of the max cache size, while the new cache decorators appear to be fixed at the size specified when defining the decorator.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-08-08 15:44:04	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, rhettinger, flox
2010-08-08 15:44:04	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-08-08 15:44:02	ncoghlan	link	issue9396 messages
2010-08-08 15:44:01	ncoghlan	create