Conversation
…rom parent packages
Collaborator
Author
|
@rcosta358 check if this doesnt break anything from the extension side pls |
rcosta358
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2026
Collaborator
rcosta358
left a comment
rcosta358
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm. also tested in the extension.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously we were not checking for subpackages for refinements.
Somehow it works in the extension (@rcosta358 maybe you did some trick?) but using the verifier alone we were erasing the information from the parent package refinements and not checking the insides.
For example:
This PR fixes that